I can’t produce the repaired HTML yet because the input is incomplete. The field labeled “Raw article (P2 output)” is empty, so there is no HTML to validate.

Ala missa naita

4 liittyvaa artikkelia

Please send:

1. **The raw P2 article HTML.** I’ll apply Gates 1–14 to it without changing facts or voice.
2. **Today’s date** (ISO format). Gate 7 requires `datePublished` and `dateModified`, and I shouldn’t guess it.

If the raw article can’t be recovered, I can reconstruct the article from the research notes under Gate 1. That would require narrowing the content plan first, because several required items have no support in the research:

– **Manuel’s biological mother and father, and his new partner:** no source in the research confirms these. Under Gate 3 they would move to the rumor list, and Gate 2 would still require them as headings, which conflicts.
– **Jana’s death date:** the verified fact says 19.3.2025 (Spain, episode 553), but the Seiska source gives 8.10.2025 (“Maansuru”). The conflict has to stay visible in the text rather than be resolved.
– **Leocadia as the killer:** the sources conflict with Cruz, and the research confidence is low. Gate 10 requires the rumor list to be at least as long as the confirmed list.
– **Internal links:** the dataset has only 2 links, while the contract asks for 4. I won’t invent the other 2.
– **External sources:** the contract asks for at least 10 sources across 6 domains. Gate 6 limits each domain to 3 external URLs, so the citations need to be checked against that cap.